THE EFFECT OF COMPUTER LABORATORY UTILIZATION ON COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES

Fadhilah Wardah Afifah; Ajat Rukajat; Fatimah Az Zahro

Authors

Fadhilah Wardah Afifah Universitas Singaperbangsa
Ajat Rukajat Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Fatimah Az Zahro Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Keywords:

Computer laboratory facilities, learning outcomes, vocational education.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of computer laboratory infrastructure on the learning outcomes of students at one of the state vocational schools in Karawang with a quantitative approach, involving 78 students as a sample, and using a questionnaire analyzed through IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The results showed that computer laboratory infrastructure facilities were in the medium category with an average score of 2.70 (64% of medium category respondents), with the highest value in the use of supporting devices such as keyboards and mice, and the lowest in the availability of main facilities such as computers and the internet. Students' learning outcomes were also in the medium category with an average score of 2.69 (68% of respondents in the medium category), although there are still several aspects that need to be improved. A simple linear regression test showed a positive and significant influence with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, a determination coefficient (R²) of 0.332 which means a contribution of 33.2%, and a regression coefficient of 0.869 which indicates that an improvement in infrastructure facilities will be followed by an increase in learning outcomes. Thus, computer laboratory infrastructure has an important role in supporting student learning outcomes and needs to be improved, especially in the main facilities so that learning outcomes are more optimal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

an Herliani, A., & Wahyudin, D. (2018). Pemetaan kompetensi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) guru pada dimensi pedagogik. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(2), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v11i2.19825

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33-54.

Firmansyah, D., Ma'mur, I., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Pendidikan Islam di Seluruh Dunia: Komunitas dan Keberagamannya. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 16(2), 18-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v16i2.3644

Hamalik, O. (2003). Perencanaan pengajaran berdasarkan pendekatan sistem.

Lina Herlina, I. M., Nining Khurrotul Aini, Ajat Saputra, Supandi. (2025). Etika Profesi Keguruan (J. H. Purnomo, Ed. Pertama ed., Vol. 1). Yayasan Pendidikan Hadiyatu Nihayah. https://doi.org/978-634-96420-3-3

Ramadani, A. N., Alwi, K., & Ahmad, M. R. S. (2025). Harmoni Sosial Keagamaan Masyarakat Islam dan Hindu Tolotang Presepsi Teori Fungsionalisme Struktural. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 751-759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i3.18935

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Kualitatif, dan Tindakan, 189-190.

Supandi, S., Subhan, M., & Hobir, A. (2024). Perbandingan Metode Pengajaran Tradisional Dan Modern Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Studi di Lembaga Pendidikan Internasional ABFA Pamekasan. j. edu. part, 3(1), 40-50.