Semi Automatic Tobacco Fertilizer Design and Anthropometry

Authors

  • Budy Wiryono University of Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Muanah Muanah University of Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Noviani Asriani University of Muhammadiyah Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31102/eam.2.1.48-57

Keywords:

Anthropometry, design, fertilizer, tobacco

Abstract

The fertilization process which is carried out by lifting the bucket, then the fertilizer solution is distributed to the roots of the plant by bending and then standing again if the availability of water has run out. If this is done continuously, then many workers complain about work risks such as back pain, arm pain, and so on. This study aims to determine the work risk, anthropometry of manual tobacco fertilizing workers, and to design a semi-automatic tobacco fertilizing device. The method used in this study is an experimental method by designing tools and testing the performance of the designed tools. Parameters observed were: level of worker complaints, worker anthropometry, dimensions and components of emitter discharge fertilization equipment and uniformity of water distribution. The results showed that the most common complaints were on body parts such as the waist, arms and shoulders, which ranged from 78% -94%. Anthropometry to design a tobacco fertilizer using the 50th percentile (P50). Measurement points such as standing height 157 cm, shoulder height standing 127 cm, waist standing 91 cm, hand length 70 cm, and hand width 10 cm. The tobacco fertilizer has components such as frames, container jerry cans, wheels, distribution hoses, panel boxes, stick sprayers. The results of testing the water discharge are by doing 4 repetitions with each discharge having 44 ml/second. The uniformity of water distribution from this tool reaches 100%.

References

Adami, P., Rodrigues Patrick, B., Woods Peter, J., Becerik-Gerber, B., Soibelman, L., Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Lucas, G. (2022). Impact of VR-Based Training on Human–Robot Interaction for Remote Operating Construction Robots. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 36(3), 04022006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001016

Barłóg, P., Grzebisz, W., & Łukowiak, R. (2022). Fertilizers and Fertilization Strategies Mitigating Soil Factors Constraining Efficiency of Nitrogen in Plant Production. Plants, 11(14). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141855

Djoko, K., Yoto, Duwi, L., & Poppy, P. (2024, 2024/02/06). Analysis of Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Nordic Body Map (NBM) on Work Fatigue. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC-5 2023).

Gajšek, B., Draghici, A., Boatca, M. E., Gaureanu, A., & Robescu, D. (2022). Linking the Use of Ergonomics Methods to Workplace Social Sustainability: The Ovako Working Posture Assessment System and Rapid Entire Body Assessment Method. Sustainability, 14(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074301

Hayati, A., Marzban, A., & Rahnama, M. (2021). Occupational safety and health in traditional date palm works. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94(6), 1455-1473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01664-4

Karwowski, W., & Zhang, W. (2021). THE DISCIPLINE OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS. In HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (pp. 1-37).

Liang, X., Yang, S., Lou, Z., & Ali, A. (2024). The Impact of Japan’s Discharge of Nuclear-Contaminated Water on Aquaculture Production, Trade, and Food Security in China and Japan. Sustainability, 16(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031285

Matisic, M., Dugan, I., & Bogunovic, I. (2024). Challenges in Sustainable Agriculture—The Role of Organic Amendments. Agriculture, 14(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040643

Ojha, A., Gautam, Y., Jebelli, H., & Akanmu, A. (2024). Physiological impact of powered back-support exoskeletons in construction: Analyzing muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, ergonomic risks, and stability. Automation in Construction, 168, 105742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105742

Pahari, S., Barman, D., & Talukdar, R. (2023). Tobacco usage in India: A meta-analysis of evidence drawn from regional studies between 2010 and 2022. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 28(9), 699-709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13924

Shahzad, A., Ullah, S., Dar, A. A., Sardar, M. F., Mehmood, T., Tufail, M. A., . . . Haris, M. (2021). Nexus on climate change: agriculture and possible solution to cope future climate change stresses. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 14211-14232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12649-8

Tongsubanan, S., & Kasemsarn, K. (2025). Developing a Design Guideline for a User-Friendly Home Energy-Saving Application That Aligns with User-Centered Design (UCD) Principles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(12), 7424-7446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2398324

Wang, X. (2022). Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security. Land, 11(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040484

Wicaksana, B. E., Setijorini, L. E., Malau, A. G., & Saputriningsih, C. L. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia's Tobacco Competitiveness in the International Market Based on HS Codes 2401.10, 2401.20, and 2401.30. Buletin Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Haluoleo, 27(1), 30-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.37149/bpsosek.v27i1.1872

Additional Files

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Wiryono, B., Muanah, M., & Asriani, N. (2025). Semi Automatic Tobacco Fertilizer Design and Anthropometry. Environmental and Agriculture Management, 2(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.31102/eam.2.1.48-57